Plans For the Obama Presidential Library Unveiled Today

A Presidential Library Worthy to Carry the Name of Barack Obama.

Jimmy Carter Celebrates His New Legacy

An emotional Jimmy Carter chokes back tears as he realizes that his legacy of being America's worst president is being eclipsed by Barack Obama.

10-Year-Old Boy Kidnapped, Obama, Biden, Democrats To Blame

ABC News reports a 10-year-old boy was kidnapped after his father tricked a court into giving him custody. Jean Philippe Lacombe, 41, allegedly fooled a court into helping him get custody of his son by presenting documents in Spanish that he said gave him legal custody of his son Jean Paul. The document was actually a warrant from Mexico for his arrest, but the court couldn't read it and believed Lacombe.

According to the mother's lawyer Miquel Ortiz, Lacombe kidnapped his son once before in 2005, fleeing from Mexico to France with the boy before the mother, Bernice Diaz regained custody. "The child is on daily medication for emotional problems stemming from the first kidnapping and now he's not taking it. That's our main concern," Ortiz said. "He has also made claims that his father physically abuses him."


Of course, this would not have been an issue had the democrats over the years, including Barack Obama and Joe Biden, not opposed legislation that would have made English the national language.

The movement to make English the national language began gathering steam during the 104th Congress while Bill Clinton was in office. Several pieces of legislation were introduced in that era, then and again over the years. The democrats have successfully opposed all attempts to make English the national language. Had we as a nation made English the national language the federal and state governments would be required to conduct all business in English. Had this been the case, the court in Texas' Bexer County would have not allowed the boy to be kidnapped by his father.

I place blame on the democrat's fear of angering a potential voting block of millions of American Hispanics and the possible future new citizens of this country of amnesty granted illegal aliens at the expense of justice. The democrats want those Hispanic votes, and if the democrats keep it their way, those votes may number into the millions. God forbid the democrats do what's best for the country to risk the alienation of the millions of votes that could come from the current and future Hispanic support base of the DNC political machine.

From a man we trust

We were warned fifty years ago about of what is happening now... As a nation, we need to listen. This is the best 30 second sound byte you'll ever hear! This is an actual historic recording.

Sent to me from a patriot hunkered down in his Arizona bunker.

The Hijacking of Patriotism To Mask The Stench Of A Fetid Agenda

As I have made the rounds of internet news sites to monitor political events, I have found that political pundits from both sides of the aisle are referring to themselves as patriots. More and more frequently each side accuses the other side of not being patriotic. Yet, it is appearing more as if the accusations from the left are made to mask their true agenda and lack of patriotism when they try shout down and marginalize the grassroots opposition to the agenda that is pushed by Mr. Obama and other misguided progressives.

Speaker Nancy Pelosi questions the opposition’s patriotism and is on record of labeling the "Tea Party" protesters as Nazis. This appears to be calculated to infer that of millions of hard working Americans are not patriots at all, but hateful bigots and thugs who are being selfish for their insistence in not wanting to pay their ‘fair share’ via increased taxes to pay for increased, big nanny, governmental control over yet more of their lives. The Axis of Extremists believe it is their 'patriotic' duty to finance their agenda by sucking more off the fruits of the working American's labor, so that the have-nots (lazy, entitlement addicted, malcontents) can live comfortably sucking off the government teet with little, or no effort on their part. This is patriotism as our Democratic leadership defines patriotism.

It has become voguish for the left to accuse the opposition of not being patriotic for resisting the kind of ‘change’ that Mr. Obama has promised for America. The kind of ’change’ that Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid and the rest of the dominating leftists on Capitol Hill are intent on ramming down the throats of Americans who object to the liberal (socialist) agenda.

One has only to read any comment section that may follow many online political commentary, or news article that is critical of what the Capitol Hill Gang and Mr. Obama, all of who I call the ’Axis of Extremists’, are endeavoring to accomplish. We see a push for the socialization of the American economy and way of life at the expense of those who simply want to work, live their lives, and to be left alone by an ever expansive, intrusive and burdensome federal government; the same government that portends to help all the people through their beneficence, paid for on the back of the hard working taxpayer.

When concerned Americans voice opposition to the progressive’s agenda, the overseers of the Axis of Extremists; Mr. Obama, Ms. Pelosi and Mr. Reid disparage those hard working Americans who simply want to preserve the greatness of America and the American way of life. The Axis of Extremists and their supporters repeat, ad nauseum that they are doing their patriotic duty for the people, whether or not the people want the change they promote and support. The Axis of Extremists presume that they themselves know better than the American people. Those who question, or protest the Axis of Extremists are seen as agents provocateurs and are labeled as being anything, but patriots.

The Encarta World English Dictionary defines a patriot as a proud supporter or defender of his or her country and its way of life. This simple definition would perfectly describe those who voice opposition to the Axis of Extremists and the agenda to socialize America. So, if one embraces, respects and believes in the preservation of the American way of life, the beliefs that patriot’s all over America cherish and embrace, then is stands to reason that those who want to fundamentally change the way America functions and operates are the farthest thing from being patriots.

If one's goal is to tear down and replace that which our Founding Fathers left us in a constitutional republic by way of our Bill of Rights and the U.S. Constitution, then one must most sincerely question the patriotism, or lack thereof, from those who feel compelled to redefine this country into something that no longer will resemble that which our Founding Fathers left to us.

The Axis of Extremists have become very skilled over the years at hijacking and redefining words for their own use. When the Axis of Extremists attempt to mask the fetid stench of that which they believe and embrace, ultimately to be foisted upon the working people who are unwilling, the Axis of Extremists will hide behind powerful and flowery sounding rhetoric and terms designed try to make the stench of that which they peddle smell much sweeter. William Shakespeare wrote; A rose by any other name would smell as sweet. William Shakespeare was saying; What matters is what something is, not what it is called. We know that socialism is not patriotism. The Axis of Extremists needs us to believe that socialism renamed patriotism is what we must have for our country. They think it is their 'patriotic' duty to drive this nation quickly down that path.

The Axis of Extremists on Capitol Hill insist that they are the true patriots, when in fact they have nothing in common with patriots. It does not matter what Obama, Pelosi, Reid and their supporters call themselves when they erroneously call themselves patriots. They spin it all into one giant lie. The Axis of Extremists in their deeds and actions while ‘serving’ we the people betray themselves as not being patriots, but as being the antithesis of what a Patriot is; traitors.

A traitor is defined as a person who is disloyal. In the case of Mr. Obama, Nancy Pelosi, and Harry Reid along their legions of blind, Kool-Aid drinking supporters, they would destroy this nation and all that it stands for, because their actions and beliefs are traitorous. Other terms that may be used to describe these traitorous malcontents are: Benedict Arnold, Judas, back-stabber, betrayer, conspirator, deceiver, defector, deserter, double-crosser, fink, hypocrite, snitch, and treasonist. I could go on, but space is limited. You get my point.

Next time you hear the Axis of Extremists questioning the patriotism of those who oppose their anti-American agenda, think of what the Axis of Extremists are really trying to do. They are trying to confuse and mislead us by questioning the patriotism of hard working Americans as they attempt to sweeten the smell of their own motives and agenda by hijacking and redefining patriotism to fit themselves and their agenda. Joseph Goebbels, Hitler's minister of propaganda would be proud that his tactics are so effectively used by the Axis of Extremists. Goebbles believed that if a lie was repeated enough, it would be seen as truth by the people. The Axis of Extremists believes this too. Still, we the real patriots, see right through it all.

Obama; A Disingenuous Media Whore

After Thursday’s massacre at Fort Hood by a Muslim officer, Mr. Obama, upon the conclusion of his White House Tribal Nations Conference, addressed the media. For over two minutes, Mr. Obama spoke of his accomplishments and agenda of the day before he mentioned the fallen at the hands of a Muslim terrorist at Fort Hood. The fact that Mr. Obama failed to immediately address the media about the Fort Hood tragedy gave evidence that Mr. Obama’s agenda and that of Native Americans (votes) took precedence over our Heroes in uniform.

Today, Mr. Obama addressed the media of the Fort Hood massacre. When Mr. Obama completed his comments, he immediately segued to patting himself on the back for his accomplishment of the day of signing new legislation to extend unemployment benefits (votes).

Two days in a row, Mr. Obama used the tragedy of Fort Hood as an excuse to get in front of the cameras to push his agenda (votes). Mr. Obama could have shown a touch of class by addressing the Fort Hood Massacre to a concerned nation without going into his usual community organizing and campaign mode while he had the attention of the media.

Mr. Obama’s actions were not presidential, nor respectful of the fallen of Fort Hood. This makes Mr. Obama our Media Whore of the week.
　

Obama to travel to Oslo to accept Nobel Peace Prize

Robert Gibbs announced in a briefing that President Obama would go to Oslo, Norway to personally accept his Nobel Peace Prize.

The question is; Will Mr. Obama travel to Oslo on the taxpayer’s dime to accept a check for his own personal gain? Will Michelle fly a day or two ahead to tour and shop in Oslo on the taxpayer’s dime?

God forbid G.W. Bush would be jet setting to Oslo to accept an award. Then again, that would never happen, a Republican gaining such recognition. Reagan is very deserving of the Nobel Peace Prize for his policies that brought down the Soviet Union, but his accomplishments are ignored. I digress.

Obama was in office just 10 days when the Nobel nomination deadline arrived. Who would have imagined such leadership and greatness in such a short span of time?

Still, one would think that Obama would pay for his own travel expenses to Oslo to accept his cash reward. After all, the trip will be for Mr. Obama’s own personal gain and enrichment.

The best thing Mr. Obama could do is to send a representative to Oslo to bag his prize. It would be easier on the taxpayer's pocketbook. Better yet, Mr. Obama could show a touch of class and just turn the honor down. The fact of the matter is, there are more deserving and more accomplished people who should be given the Nobel Peace Prize.

History will record that Mr. Obama was just a community organizer from Chicago who lacked the experience to lead the free world. History will note that Mr. Obama merely presided over a mediocre presidency that was on par or less than that of Jimmy Carter’s term in office. Ultimately, it will be shown that Mr. Obama will never have been deserving of such an honor.

If anything, Mr. Obama should have been nominated for an Oscar, not a Nobel Peace Prize for his performance as one who unapologetically loves his country, its principles and its Constitution. That performance has been more believable to the leftard lemmings that fawn over Mr. Obama, than has been the performance of acting as a great political leader and peacemaker. Then again, I may be wrong. It is those leftist lemmings who think Mr. Obama is deserving of the Nobel Peace Prize, even if he has accomplished nothing to get the prize.

When Mr. Obama wraps up his campaign and photo op stop in Oslo, perhaps he can return to the United States to engage in the work of the American People. He might consider endorsing his Nobel Peace Prize check over to the U.S. Treasury to reimburse the American people for his travel expenses, meals, lodging and Secret Service protection.

A Concerned US Senior Citizen Speaks Out on The Healthcare Bill - Parts 1 & 2

A "Good Ole Boy" down in Texas and his wife made the following video from their ranch in south-central Texas. At their own expense, they made 1000 copies and sent one to every single congressman and senator and a few media outlets. Let's hope that each and every one of them watched and LISTENED!!!

Obama Appointed Panel Says NASA Underfunded; Can't Accomplish Goals.

Friday’s Miami Herald carries a story that a panel reviewing NASA's current plans for human space flight reports that there is no realistic way to return to the moon by 2020 -- or even 2028. This is the conclusion by The Human Space Flight Plans Committee, appointed by President Barack Obama. The committee has searched for a way to put together a realistic plan for America’s goal to place men back on the moon. Under current budgeting for NASA, former President Bush’s proposed goal of returning men the moon by 2020 is seen as unrealistic and may not be possible until well after 2030. NASA’s annual budget is 9 billion a year. The panel reports that meeting the goal of a renewed presence on the moon will not be possible unless a $50 billion gap in NASA’s budget can be resolved.

President Obama ran for election with promises of stimulating the economy to build jobs in the United States with the hopes of pulling this nation out of its current financial crisis. Not investing more money in NASA and its efforts to place men on the moon and beyond will not allow the type of innovation and development that could really stimulate the economy to take root. The scientific breakthroughs and technology that could be spawned by a renewed push into space exploration could mean more stimulation for the economy as new consumer goods derived from technological innovation for the space program begin to enter the marketplace.

Our government is spending hundreds of billions of dollars of taxpayer’s money to bailout banks and the auto industry for their mismanagement and failures. Acorn, a favorite “non-profit” organization of President Obama’s will receive over 8.5 billion in tax payer’s dollars this year; an amount which is just shy of NASA’s annual budget.

With all the money Capitol Hill and the President are throwing around in corporate welfare and in paying back political favors, or in just ensuring more bought votes in exchange for a few “free” taxpayer dollars, the vision has been lost for truthfully stimulating the economy. The money the President and our representatives are so freely spending belongs to the taxpayer. So, why not throw a little money NASA’s way, which in turn would stimulate the economy and do us all some good?

If our government was to fund NASA with a budget adequate enough to quickly establish a full-time presence on the moon and for missions beyond; imagine what the potential could be for new innovations that could be developed while supporting a more robust space program? Imagine the positive economic effects as new innovations cross over to the private sector? There would be a substantial infusion of new jobs, manufacturing and new industries created for the next generation to take advantage of. Why wouldn’t Washington want to increase funding for NASA?

Past experience has shown that investment in a robust space program brings new industry and economic growth. Of course, the reality is that our lawmakers and our president are determined to shower special interests and community organizing groups with stimulus funds to secure their own political future over the future of, and the economic well being of the American taxpayer, who’s on the hook for all of Washington’s pet projects and boondoggles.

It’s becoming quite apparent that President Obama and Capitol Hill have no interest in stimulating the economy to benefit the American people when refusing to invest in true science and exploration by investing in NASA. Perhaps President Obama and Capitol Hill fear that investing in NASA and the building of a robust space program would cause trickle-down economics, an economic concept that truly works. The only economy our politicians are interested in is more of a trickle-up poverty kind of economy. Perhaps our political leaders are only motivated to benefit their own power base and personal economies by filling their own bank accounts and those of their cronies and special interest groups with stolen taxpayer funds. Meanwhile, they see a poor and inpoverished underclass as a citizenry dependent on the federal government, which ensures their grip on power.

Perhaps it is time we demand that our tax money be used to invest on our future as a nation, rather than the future of the elites in Washington D.C.. As a nation, we need to demand that NASA gets stimulated with some generous funding as a means to further fix our economy.